The Antelope Valley Times

Your community. Your issues. Your news.

CA Primary Election Results (district races)

by •

(Top L to R) Buck McKeon, Lee Rogers, Ron Smith. (Bottom L to R) Steve Knight, Star Moffatt, Steve Fox.

The California primary semi-official results are in with 100% of the precincts reporting. The top two vote-getters below will advance to the General Election in November.

U.S. Congress, District 25

  1. Howard P. “Buck” McKeon, Republican ………. 31,489 votes 50.2%
  2. Lee C. Rogers, Democrat ………. 18,959 votes 30.2%
    Dante Acosta, Republican ………. 8,076 votes 12.9%
    Cathie Wright, Republican ………. 4,185 votes 6.7%

State Assembly, District 36

  1. Ron Smith, Republican ………. 12,087 votes  34.8%
  2. Steve Fox, Democrat ………. 11,491 votes 33.0%
    Tom Lackey, Republican ………. 11,194 votes 32.2%

State Senate, District 21

  1. Steve Knight, Republican ………. 49,677 votes  68.6%
  2. Star Moffatt, Democrat………. 22,722 votes  31.4%

OTHER COUNTY RACES

[*] denotes the top vote getter(s) who will take office.

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, 5th District

* Michael D. Antonovich ………. 74,539 votes 80.39%
– Raj Pal Kahlon ………. 18,186 votes 19.61%

Democratic Party County Central Committee (Assembly District 36)

  1. * Camille Dunn ………. 4,363 votes 13.15%
  2. * Diana Love ………. 4,042 votes 12.18%
  3. * Darren W. Parker ………. 3,610 votes 10.88%
  4. * Kermit F. Franklin ………. 3,402 votes 10.26%
  5. * Andy K. Giest ………. 3,234 votes 9.75%
  6. * Joyce Ricks ………. 3,007 votes 9.06%
  7. * Bob Forshay ………. 2,993 votes 9.02%
    Joellen McElroy ………. 2,961 votes 8.93%
    Deborah A. Brandon ………. 2,827 votes 8.52%
    Steven Leyton ………. 2,735 votes 8.24%

Republican Party County Central Committee (Assembly District 36)

  1. * Tom Lackey ………. 9,692 votes 16.46%
  2. * Mike Dispenza ………. 7,186 votes 12.2%
  3. * Larry Grooms ………. 6,392 votes 10.85%
  4. * Norm Hickling ………. 5,942 votes 10.09%
  5. * Marvin Crist ………. 5,702 votes 9.68%
  6. * Drew Mercy ………. 5,509 votes 9.36%
  7. * Lisa Moulton ………. 4,743 votes 8.05%
    Matthew D. Smith ………. 3,399 votes 5.77%
    John W. Yount ………. 2,123 votes 3.61%
    Christopher G. Uhl ………. 2,052 votes 3.48%
    Kristen C. Stark ………. 1,958 votes 3.32%
    Earl Allen ………. 1,938 votes 3.29%
    Sharon Ricklefs ………. 1,297 votes 2.2%
    Michael David Wigle ………. 955 votes 1.62%

STATE BALLOT MEASURES

  • Proposition 28 – Limits on Legislators’ Terms in Office
    Yes 2,319,580  61.4%.…………………..No 1,456,502  38.6%
    –
  • Proposition 29 – Tax on Cigarettes for Cancer Research
    Yes 1,894,611  49.2%…………………...No 1,957,714  50.8%

Source: California Secretary of State and Los Angeles County.

–

Filed Under: Politics

25 comments for "CA Primary Election Results (district races)"

  1. Central committee results;
    Bob Forshay lost to JoEllen McElroy by 1 vote to be ousted as a member of the central committee. He is now an alternate.

  2. Star Moffatt, picked up nearly 27,000 votes as of now. This is the highest number of votes of any of the Dem candidates. Star is also ahead of Rogers with her percentage of voters. If we look at the Primary, as essentially a Republican Primary, when the Dems come out in November all three Dem candidates are in the running. Recall the Dems have won this area in the last 2 elections via voting for Gore and Obama; voting Dem in this election for Star, Fox and Rogers will be the only way to change the current power structure.

    • I read some where that Star was pro gay rights. I hope this is not just lip service. We need someone who will fight to get our contributions to American history recognized in the classrooms. Steve Knight drafted a bill to do the exact opposite. He has fought against LGBT advances at every turn. Is Star a voice for us, or will she cave to the AV populace who think we’re some kind of abomination? These are things I would like to know before November. Also is Star a former Republican like Steve Fox?

  3. Smith’s signs say he’s a leader. Bad as Parris is, he provides some leadership. Ron is a follower and the worst kind. The kind that follows blindly without asking questions

  4. Smith is a joke. I only wish he’d get elected so Lancaster can get rid of him. Tell us how you “retired” from the LASD Ron!

  5. Looks like the Dems may finaly win one. Smith will finaly have to answer questions (his weak suit) like is he or is he not receiving a mental health disability from LA County.

    • I guess Smith wants to get on the Runner/Knight gravy train. You know, those small-and anti-government conservatives just love the perks from ‘not serving’ all their constituents.

      • Smith will do well dividing efforts towards progress and brokering chaos in the assembly. I can’t wait to see him leave.

  6. Lackey is NOT out. The two top vote getters regardless of party, according to new law must slug it out. Ron Boy Smith must still beat Lackey, which with how much $ he spent to slim out a margin of 1% will only get worst.

      • I have known steve fox fo a pretty good while and any canidate that wants my vote i have to see you like ive seen counsel steve fox out in the highways and trenches getting conected with the people i know he will serve the people well you earned my vote mr fox i wish you well

  7. With Lackey out, the Ledford DINO Democrats don’t have a their Republican candidate to sell out to over the Democrat they’re supposed to support.

    I wonder if they’ll do the unthinkable and actually support the Democrat, Fox; sit this out all together; or be directed by Ledford to overcome their faux Lancaster Bogeyman Syndrome, and hold their nose and vote for Smith.

      • Thats only LA County, you have to look at the Secretary of States page for district results for this race.

    • What’s sad for us Republicans is that Ron Smith is so pathetic he has galvanized the Democrats in Fox’s favor. You don’t run a candidate the dispisment factor of Smith. We should have let Lackey take the lead. At least he is electable.

  9. Now Go pick up your damn Signs! You have 2 weeks and I will be watching. I suggest you start at Saddle Back Butte since most of them have blown that far since they were haphazardly placed (in many cases illegally [Star Moffatt])

    Political graffiti needs to be eliminated and if it is not it should be rewarded with the same felony charges as other graffiti.

    • The signs shouldn’t be allowed on any but private property with permission. Since name recognition is a big factor, seeing someone’s name plastered everywhere probably gets them some votes from uninformed voters.

      And, that outcome is worse than the litter they create.

  11. So… Enough with the preliminaries, now its on to the real races.

    Let the fun begin!