A judge said Wednesday she was inclined to dismiss on First Amendment grounds part of a defamation suit by former Rep. Katie Hill concerning a reporter who co-authored a story featuring nude photos of Hill with a female campaign staff member and holding a bong appearing to contain marijuana.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Yolanda Orozco said she will instead wait until April 8 to hear a motion filed late Tuesday by Hill’s attorneys to reopen discovery and conduct a short deposition of reporter Jennifer Van Laar to determine the identities of the parties with whom she shared the images.
Hill’s lawyers, including Carrie Goldberg, maintain that Van Laar had no First Amendment protection in distributing the photos, especially the one involving the bong. Lawyers for Van Laar maintain the limited discovery will not turn up any relevant new information. In her tentative ruling, the judge said Van Laar had shown the photos were matters of legitimate interest involving a public official.
“(Van Laar) has established that the images are a matter of public concern, as they speak to (Hill’s) character and qualifications for her position, allegedly depicting an extramarital sexual relationship with a paid campaign staff member and the use of illegal drugs by a sitting congresswoman,” Orozco wrote.
Hill’s argument that the images are not a matter of public concern because Van Laar could have simply described the images rather than publishing them is “unpersuasive,” according to the judge, because the fact that information to be gleaned from an image may be disseminated in an alternative manner “does not equate to a finding that the image itself is not a matter of public concern.”
According to media reports, Van Laar was a campaign advisor to former Rep. Steve Knight, R-Palmdale, who was unseated by Hill in 2018. A story co-written by Van Laar that appeared in the Daily Mail in October 2019 featuring nude photos of Hill with the female campaign staffer followed a series of reports published on RedState.com, a conservative political site that lists Van Laar as its deputy managing editor.
The 33-year-old Hill submitted a lengthy sworn declaration in opposition to Van Laar’s dismissal motion.
“Van Laar knew, or should have known, that I had a reasonable expectation that the images would remain private,” Hill said. “Van Laar refers to herself as a journalist in her declaration. I believe that California’s law against the nonconsensual distribution of intimate images is widely known and believe that someone that describes themselves as a journalist would be aware of it too.”
Moreover, Hill said, “I understand that adults over the age of 21 can legally use marijuana for recreational and/or medical purposes in California. I have, at various points, been prescribed medicinal marijuana in California. To the best of my knowledge, the recreational use of marijuana by adults has been legal in California since 2016.”
Hill’s lawsuit was filed Dec. 22 and also targets her ex-husband, Kenneth Heslep, the Daily Mail and RedState.com. She alleges in her court papers that she lived in fear that if she ever tried to leave, Heslep would kill them both and their animals. In October 2019, months after Hill had left her relationship with Heslep for good, RedState.com published “the first in a barrage of articles that included pictures and intimate text messages,” according to Hill’s court papers. “Then the sexually graphic photos were released.”
Hill “suffered extreme emotional distress, attempted suicide and was forced to quit her job, which in this case was the representative of California’s 25th Congressional District, one of the most difficult-to-get jobs in the universe,” her court papers state.
On Dec. 8, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge ordered Heslep to stay at least 100 yards away from his 33-year-old ex-wife, as well as her mother and sister. The ex-couple officially divorced in October.
Hill, a Democrat, resigned her seat in 2019 after the nude photos of her were published and news emerged that she had a three-way relationship with her husband and a campaign staffer. She was also accused of having an affair with a member of her congressional staff.
Hill publicly blamed her husband then for the release of the photos. Speaking in Congress in 2019, she decried a “misogynistic culture that gleefully consumed my naked pictures, capitalized on my sexuality and enabled my abusive ex to continue that abuse, this time with the entire country watching.”
The 25th Congressional District includes the Antelope Valley. The seat had long been held by Republicans until Hill’s 2018 victory over Knight. After Hill’s resignation, Republican Rep. Mike Garcia defeated Democratic Assemblywoman Christy Smith in a special election to fill the final 7 1/2 months of the term.
Garcia then beat Smith again by a razor-thin margin in November’s election for a full two-year term.
–
Bob says
Typical democrat lol – I would never support her, however Katie Hill should have remained in office after her sexual scandal and represented the people that elected her. You don’t see that kook in New York resigning.
She resigned to avoid the legal issues that would have followed, or to put in in simpler terms “to save her own butt’.
Democrat Dave says
Bob, did you vote for Trump?
I love how Republicans and Fox “news”??? are all over Cuomo right now for sexual harassment allegations while ignoring the dozens of lawsuits lined-up and waiting to see Trump in court the next few years.
Are you like that, Bob? Did you talk about Trump’s sexual activities?
BTW I’m all for Cuomo resigning as are many Democrats in New York. Republicans don’t resign. They get re-elected after they get caught or put on the Supreme Court, i.e. Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh.
That’s why the Republican Party is such a effed up mess and may not be around much longer. Trump is trying to destroy it like he does everything he touches. Right? Right.
Rudy says
… this Smith woman’s an archetypic democrat. She truly cherishes our founding fathers’ 1st amendment guarantee. But, only for herself. Not for anyone else. Much like the people here at the AV Times, this Smith woman believes only democrats ought to have a 1st amendment priviledge, opposing viewpoints and opinions censored, silenced, suppressed. That’s not exactly what our Founding Fathers had in mind.
Sheila says
The woman gets no sympathy from me. In my book, she got what she had coming. Those who can’t be bothered to manage their love life have no business holding high office.
Democrat Dave says
Rudy. Haven’t you ignored or dismissed all the3 lying, badmouthing and trash talking from Trump who is still pushing THE BIG LIE about election fraud?
He still thinks he won. Do you think he won?
Trump tells whoppers and incited an insurrection at the Captial where 5 people ended up dying yet some people look for relatively minor stuff on the Democrats. There is no comparison whatsoever between what Democrats have done and what Republicans have and are still doing.
The GOP is dead and they don’t know it. The party is starting to smell bad from the decay.
Meahwhile, President Joe Biden is doing an excellent job cleaning up the mess Trump left behind just like what Bush left for Obama AND Biden. Biden has experience cleaning up after Republicans doesn’t he?
8 years cleaning up the Great Bush Recession and now the Great Trump Recession and the dismal response to COVID by Trump and Pence.
Remember, Pence was supposed to head up the COVID respnse team and for months last year, the team didn’t even meet or have pressers? Then, after the election, neither did anything about it for months and Biden discovered there was no plan for distributing the vaccines when he took over.
Now, Trump is trying to take credit for the vaccine. Let him. It’s just 1 more lie to add to the 30,000+ he already said. Trump lies when the truth would do.