The lawsuit names City Controller Ron Galperin and alleges that Galperin’s decision was “unauthorized, unlawful and politicized.” It seeks a ruling to strike down the decision as unlawful, along with attorneys’ fees.
Ridley-Thomas was suspended from the council last October after his indictment. The lawsuit claims that Galperin acted unilaterally to cut Ridley-Thomas’ pay and did so to help his campaign for state controller. Galperin finished fifth in the field of six.
Chelsea Lucktenberg, Galperin’s director of communications, declined comment Thursday, citing pending litigation. But in a statement after suspending Ridley-Thomas’ pay last year, Galperin said he “could not use city money to pay the salary of an elected official facing federal bribery and fraud charges who is now legally unable to do his job.”
“Mark Ridley-Thomas is no longer empowered to carry out the duties and responsibilities for which he was elected, and he can no longer be present to effectively serve his constituents or represent their interests at City Hall,” Galperin said at the time.
Rob Wilcox, the director of community engagement and outreach for the City Attorney’s Office, did not immediately respond to a request for comment but told the Los Angeles Times the city’s lawyers would review the lawsuit. The Times was first to report the lawsuit.
Ridley-Thomas and former dean of the USC School of Social Work Marilyn Flynn were charged in a 20-count indictment alleging a secret deal in which Ridley-Thomas — when he was a member of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors — agreed to steer county money to the university in return for admitting his son Sebastian Ridley-Thomas into graduate school with a full-tuition scholarship and a paid professorship.
Flynn allegedly arranged to funnel a $100,000 donation from Mark Ridley-Thomas’ campaign funds through the university to a nonprofit organization to be operated by Sebastian Ridley-Thomas, a former member of the Assembly. The donation prompted an investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles that remains open, prosecutors said.
In exchange, the indictment contends, Ridley-Thomas supported county contracts involving the School of Social Work, including lucrative deals to provide services to the county Department of Children and Family Services and Probation Department, as well as an amendment to a contract with the Department of Mental Health that would bring the school millions of dollars in new revenue.
Both defendants have strongly denied any wrongdoing and promised that evidence will clear their names. Ridley-Thomas’ trial was delayed until November earlier this month.
Herb Wesson, who was appointed the temporary replacement to represent the 10th District for Ridley-Thomas in February, was blocked by a Superior Court judge last week from performing any council functions. The decision by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mary Strobel effectively blocks Wesson from representing the district, although it did not formally remove him from the post. The ruling marked the second time Strobel has issued a restraining order against Wesson’s service on the council. On Feb. 24, Strobel sided with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference of Southern California’s challenge to Wesson’s appointment, issuing a temporary restraining order that blocked him from serving.
But she later vacated the order and declined to issue a preliminary injunction, saying that procedurally, the SCLC needed to obtain permission from the state Attorney General’s Office to proceed with its legal challenge. According to the appointment, Wesson is supposed to hold the position through Dec. 31 unless Ridley-Thomas is acquitted or the charges against him are dropped.
Galperin also cut off Wesson’s pay last week after the judge’s decision, The Times reported.
Previous related stories:
Former LACo Supervisor Ridley-Thomas criminal trial moved to November
August trial date set in Ridley-Thomas corruption case
Mark Ridley-Thomas, ex-USC dean indicted in alleged bribery scheme
–
Andre Leonard says
Does Mark really think that taxpayers want to pay his salary and benefits while he is awaiting trial for corruption? I think I speak on behalf of most taxpayers that ‘NO’ we don’t want to pay him for doing nothing. He should have thought this out before engaging in the behavior that got him indicted.
Sad lament of a government lifer.
ACE says
A PHOTO OF A NICE YOUNG AND HONEST CANDIDATE…
WHAT HAPPENS TO MAKE TO TURN OUT TO BE SUCH BIG CROOKS..?
***