Vote centers will be open across Los Angeles County, beginning Saturday, March 2, for residents to cast in-person ballots for the upcoming presidential primary election.
Early voting was already available at the county Registrar- Recorder/County Clerk’s Office in Norwalk, at 12400 Imperial Highway. The 119 centers opening Saturday are spread throughout the county in hopes of encouraging more people to get their votes in early.
The centers will be open daily from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. Voters can cast their ballots at any center, regardless of where they live in the county. A list of nearby locations can be found online at locator.lavote.gov. People who missed the voter-registration deadline but still want to vote can register at a vote center and cast a provisional ballot.
On Election Day, March 5, the centers will be open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m.
–
Vote says
Meanwhile in Lancaster, the tradition of holding city elections apart from general elections continues. On top of that, it’s a mail only election, run and verified by the city of Lancaster. What could possibly go wrong? If you’re tired of all the hot air coming out of the mayor and his minions, vote them out. Check your mail, vote, and mail the ballot back. We can only hope there are no shenanigans going on.
Mark Bozegen says
Voter suppression is not new to Lancaster as those elected officials could write a book on “how to” as it keeps those same tired yes men for Rex.
L. Lex Harris says
Who is counting the votes? Is there an independent company overseeing? Rex and the rest of them cannot be trusted. No politicians should be trusted to count votes.
Election Day says
I voted twice.
Tim Scott says
So you are a Republican I guess.
Mike says
Better to be republican than a convicted bank robbing felon.
Tim Scott says
Three weeks and that’s all you got Mike? What a loser.
Suea says
Hi Tim. I know you are a dedicated reader to the AV Times. Do you know why they have stopped putting it online more frequently than once a month? I have emailed the editor so many times, but he chooses not to answer me. I used to live in Lancaster and like to keep up to date with what’s going on there.
Tim Scott says
Hi,
No, I don’t know what happened. I am pretty sure the editor is the owner/operator of the site. If she isn’t responding to e-mail that suggests that she may have given up.
Fredsie says
It’s still more than what you are in life. Delores must be proud.
Tim Scott says
Is Delores your wife’s name Fredsie? I didn’t even ask her.
Friedman, et. al. says
Really, not much difference anymore. The thing is a SINGLE bank robber is a problem of much lower proportion than an entire criminal enterprise centered upon a presumption of ideological supremacy while promoting a propaganda of simultaneous victimhood and extreme wealth.
Racketeering as a political venture is the last stage of free market capitalism. Thereafter: oligarchy or aristocracy
Tim Scott says
Mostly accurate, but the USA has never really had free market capitalism. Due to the general public being manipulated through their fear of government we have never had the necessary regulation to keep our markets from being distorted by monopolies and cartels. So the best we have ever done is limited oligarchy.
Rick M says
The more you talk the more pathetic you sound timmy.
Tim Scott says
Hi Rick. At a guess your qualifications to discuss economics are nonexistent, so your opinion here is worthless.
Rick M says
Economics from a convicted bank robber. Lmao
Tim Scott says
Yeah, prison record and an economics degree. What have you got? Rubber nose and greasepaint?
Rick M says
Online economics degree and prison time. And you’re boasting about it. Lmao.
Tim Scott says
On line? Nope, guess again. Did you get your rubber nose from an on line clown school?
Rick M says
So did the degree come before or after the grand thought of robbing banks.
Tim Scott says
I’m more interested in talking about where you went to clown school.
Rick M says
I guess answering is hard knowing that bragging about having an economic degree is a result of having done little with it or nothing at all.
Tim Scott says
My first job after I got out of the navy required a degree, so it was useful for that. But mostly for me having a degree is more about knowing what I am talking about. Other people who are educated about economics recognize from what I say and how I say it that I have that education. Just like people recognize from what you say and how you say it that you most likely do have that rubber nose from clown school.
Rick M says
He’s the Wiz, lol
Rick M says
So let me understand this higher evolutionary path, a stint in the Navy then a degree for a job ‘supposedly’, then idiot bank robber. I think that fall from a shopping cart was the only education you have.
Tim Scott says
Why should anyone care about the random fantasy thoughts about me that wander through your head?
Maynard Keynes says
Capitalism WANTS efficiency. Consumption takes many forms, and typically it is a shared experience of acquisition, in mainly COMMODITY goods. There are BESPOKE goods, and those are INEFFICIENT. Yet, even the titans of luxury (Gucci, YSL) have come to provide their goods in commodity style, without sacrificing margins.
I suppose a more idealized world you’d propose would seek a regulated form of diversity for any/all supply, even if it meant that many/most consumers would suffer overall higher cost of living as a result, or would be less consumptive. I don;t mean to put words in your mouth, just trying to interpret…
I mean, imagine if we DID try to enforce that almonds (for example) be grown upon plots no larger than 5 acres by individual farmers who are not allowed to pool their costs/risks and/or profits/growth. WE would be hardly capitalist at all. At least with the quasi-oligarchy we bring greater benefit thru efficiency to a larger portion of the population. It chases surplus, rather than scarcity, in order to deliver general thrift.
Tim Scott says
You incorrectly differentiate the consumer from the producer. There is a valid argument that “efficiencies of scale allow for lower prices to the consumer.” However, the cost of monopolization is that profits from production become concentrated into the least productive hands, leaving the majority of ‘consumers’ (in their other role as producers) with lessened ability to consume. It’s a net loss for them.
Rick M says
Tell us timmy.
Tim Scott says
Wow. I thought that when someone who can actually discuss economics with me came along Rick would have the minimal sense required to take his blatting horn and squirting flower antics elsewhere.
iconoclast says
Are you from Chicago?
Fredsie says
No, it’s your mammies name. Everyone knows that.